24 May 2005

Crimes of office

[[“source”;http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.mpl/metropolitan/3188696], source

Travis County District Attorney Ronnie Earle, who denies partisan motives for his investigation of a political group founded by Republican leader Tom DeLay, was the featured speaker last week at a Democratic fund-raiser where he spoke directly about the congressman.

A newly formed Democratic political action committee, Texas Values in Action Coalition, hosted the May 12 event in Dallas to raise campaign money to take control of the state Legislature from the GOP, organizers said.

[…]

“This case is not just about Tom DeLay. If it isn’t this Tom DeLay, it’ll be another one, just like one bully replaces the one before,” Earle said.

So it’s nothing personal , Earle is prosecuting DeLay for being Republican while in office.

Posted by orbital at 8:46 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

I learned technicalities from the master

[source, source]

Howard Dean, national chairman of the Democratic Party, said Tuesday that he thinks House Majority Leader Tom DeLay has committed crimes that could put the Republican in jail.

DeLay’s office fought back with Dean’s own words from the 2004 presidential campaign. The former Vermont governor had maintained that even terrorist leader Osama bin Laden should not be pre-judged if captured.

“I’ve resisted pronouncing a sentence before guilt is found,” Dean said during the 2004 Democratic primary campaign. “I still have this old-fashioned notion that even with people like Osama, who is very likely to be found guilty, we should do our best not to, in positions of executive power, not to prejudge jury trials.”

I suppose Dean will claim that he’s not in a position of executive power, something for which we can all be grateful.

Posted by orbital at 8:42 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

Oh horrors, not that!

[source, source]

MR. McCLELLAN: Look, this report caused serious damage to the image of the United States abroad. And Newsweek has said that they got it wrong. I think Newsweek recognizes the responsibility they have. We appreciate the step that they took by retracting the story. Now we would encourage them to move forward and do all that they can to help repair the damage that has been done by this report. And that’s all I’m saying. But, no, you’re absolutely right, it’s not my position to get into telling people what they can and cannot report.…

Q Are you asking them to write a story about how great the American military is; is that what you’re saying here?

MR. McCLELLAN: Elisabeth, let me finish my sentence. Our military —

Q You’ve already said what you’re — I know what — how it ends.

Yes, what could be worse from Old Media’s point of view than writing about how great the American military is?

Posted by orbital at 8:39 PM | View 1 Comments | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

Eventually I'll be so far behind I'll be ahead

Sorry for the extreme unpostingness but I’m now working seriously on my start up and just don’t spend the time reading the blogosphere like I used to.

Posted by orbital at 8:37 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL