31 December 2003

Cultural preservation

[source]

The French journalist Alain Hertoghe paid a heavy price for accusing leading French newspapers of being unreasonably critical of the United States when covering the war in Iraq. In a recent book, La Guerre à Outrances, he wrote that the papers saw “the war they would have liked to have seen,” infusing news stories with their ideological preferences. This prompted Hertoghe’s own employer, the Catholic daily La Croix, to fire him because he had maligned its war coverage.

Clearly this was done because dissent is American and we can’t have that kind of thing in France.

Posted by orbital at 2:40 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

It's not dissent if it's the wrong opinion

[source, source]

Tim Bueler recently received some unusual advice: His principal and a campus police officer suggested that he stay home from his California high school for a few days.

They feared for his safety because Tim, the founder of Rancho Cotate High School’s new Conservative Club, said he had received threats from other students after writing an article for the club newsletter calling for a crackdown on illegal immigration.

The article also cites a number of incidents where teachers

  • explicitly declined to protect Bueler
  • told him he “deserved” the violence he was threatened with
  • joined in name calling and abuse of Bueler

I wonder if any of those teachers ever complain about the lack of discipline and respect among their students.

Posted by orbital at 1:09 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

It's not like it's important data

[source, source]

A company developing security technology for electronic voting suffered an embarrassing hacker break-in that executives think was tied to the rancorous debate over the safety of casting ballots online.

This doesn’t make me feel less confident about electronic voting - that meter was already pegged.

Posted by orbital at 1:03 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

Texas Democrats avoid burdening voters

[source, source]

The head of the Texas Democrats on Tuesday vowed that his party would field “scores” of candidates to challenge incumbent Republicans in the 2004 elections, but with filing for the March primaries ending Friday, no Democrat has stepped forward in any of the statewide races.

It’s just the primaries - why get the voters involved in selecting the candidates for the real election?

Posted by orbital at 12:31 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

Free markets vs. compassionate markets

[source]

Some will see this as simply a natural disaster of the kind to which Iran, according to Khatami, is “prone”. Four days earlier, however, there had been another earthquake of about the same intensity, this time in California. In which about 0.000001% of the buildings suffered serious structural damage and two people were killed when an old clocktower collapsed. So why the polar disparity between Bam and Paso Robles?

This is not a silly question. True, the Californians are much richer than the Iranians. But if you believed everything you read in the works of M Moore and others, you would anticipate a culture of corporate greed in which safety and regulation came way behind the desire to turn the quick buck. Instead you discover a society in which the protection of citizens from falling masonry seems to be regarded as enormously important.

Whereas in Iran - for all its spiritual solidarity - the authorities don’t appear to give a toss. The report in this paper from Teheran yesterday was revealing. It was one thing for the old, mud-walled citadel to fall down, but why the new hospitals? An accountant waiting to give blood at a clinic in the capital told our correspondent that it was a “disgrace that a rich country like ours with all the revenue from oil and other natural resources is not prepared to deal with an earthquake”.

[…]

What, I wonder, has Arundhati Roy to say now about the superiority of traditional building methods over globalised ones? Some Iranians might think that it’s a shame there wasn’t a McDonald’s in Bam. It would have been the safest place in town.

David Aaronovitch

Posted by orbital at 12:27 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL

As a flock, they're there to be fleeced

[source, source]

The ancient city of Bam, the epicenter of the quake, has a long history of destruction. It was first destroyed in an earthquake almost 1,900 years ago. But such is the unexplainable magnetism of Bam that, almost eight centuries later, it had become an important trading center with a cosmopolitan population of Muslims, Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians.

The city was again almost totally razed by an earthquake in 1911. But by the 1930s it had reemerged as a trading center and a producer of dates and pistachios. Then came other earthquakes in 1950 and 1966.

By the early 1970s, the government had decided not to allow people to build new houses in Bam itself. The city’s ancient monuments were declared part of the heritage of mankind under UNESCO and no new buildings permits were issued for almost six years.

The revolutionary turmoil of 1978-79 provided racketeers with an opportunity to seize large chunks of land in Bam and use it for poorly designed and badly constructed houses and shops. The racket was backed by a group of powerful mullahs who, in exchange for a cut in the proceeds, issued fatwas (religious opinions) that canceled government orders that banned house-building in the city.

Stunning, the kind of benefits the Iranian Revolution has brought to The People™.

Posted by orbital at 12:22 PM | View 0 TrackBacks | Trackback URL